In Meditation Six, Descartes reaches the conclusion that corporeal things exist. What considerations convince him of this? (AT 79-80)

I’m working on a philosophy multi-part question and need support to help me study.

 

Get Your Custom Essay Written From Scratch
We have worked on a similar problem. If you need help click order now button and submit your assignment instructions.
Just from $9/Page
Order Now

i have already finished the job, just need someone help me to seperate each anser under each question.

  1. In Meditation Six, Descartes reaches the conclusion that “I am really distinct from my body, and can exist without it” (AT 78). What considerations convince him of this? (AT 78)
  2. In Meditation Six, Descartes reaches the conclusion that corporeal things exist. What considerations convince him of this? (AT 79-80)
  3. Descartes says that “I and the body constitute one single thing” (AT 81). What does this mean, and what convinces him of it? (AT 81)
  4. At the conclusion of Meditation Six, Descartes claims that the difficulty in distinguishing being asleep from being awake should now be rejected (AT 89). What reasons does he give for this rejection? (AT 89-90)

 

UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Running head: SIXTH MEDITATION 1 Sixth Meditation Name Institution SIXTH MEDITATION 2 Sixth Meditation Based on Descartes’s arguments, the body and mind are two substances that are independent in such a way that they can exist without each other. Notably, the body and mind are completely distinct, they can be a single thing thanks to the causal relationship between them (Thibaut, 2018). According to Descartes, the causal relationship between the body and mind can be categorized into mind-to-body causation and body-to-mind causation. When it comes to the body-to-mind causation, any destruction to the body inflicts pain. Likewise, the mind-to-body causation for instance could facilitate the urge to take coffee. The need to have coffee is triggered by the brain and forces an individual to stand up and get the drink from a coffee pot. The mind is distinct from the body because of several reasons. God created things that can be clearly and distinctly perceived. If things are independent of one another, then it means that they are distinct. A thinking thing therefore can clearly and distinctly exist without necessarily requiring the body for existence. The body on the other hand can be said to be an extended thing and does not need the mind for existence. This implies that the body was created independently of a mind and the mind was created independently of a body. So it can be deduced that a body is not required for a thinking thing to exist and the body is a reality distinct from the mind. Further, the causal relationship between mind and body is of an intimate and very special kind. They are not like the connections that exist between a vessel and the sailor though the two like the mind and body, operate in causal relationships. The relationship between the mind and body is intermingled. However, the body is not identical to any mind. Notably, minds lack extension whereas the bodies have extensions. This, therefore, implies that there is no existence SIXTH MEDITATION 3 of mind in space (Curley, 2015). Whatever the case, the body and mind can be a single thing since the mind can trigger effects on the body and the body can affect the mind. Borrowing from a dualism point of perspective, the bodies and mind are two different things and not one. Descartes argues that the mind and body are two clear and distinct substances. This, therefore, means that if the body and mind are distinct, then they can be separated. The physical body cannot be separated from the nonmaterial soul or thinking. The nonmaterial part, which happens to be the mind is independent of the physical laws related to the body and nature (Heinämaa & Kaitaro, 2018). However, the body is not independent of the laws of nature. In other words, the physical body can be subjected to death but the mind cannot be impacted by death. Apart from what is discussed above, the imagination is not essentially part of the mind. The imagination must be dependent on something else to exist other than the mind. It would therefore be worth arguing that imagination is linked to the body. This connection enables the mind to capture corporeal objects. The mind connects to the body through imagination. The body in this context experiences hunger, emotion, pain, pleasure among others. The body can also detect other bodies with taste, smell, color, heat, hardness, movement, shape, and extension. Considering this, all these perceptions do not emanate from an outside source but come from the mind. SIXTH MEDITATION 4 References Curley, E. (2015). Descartes on the Mind-Body Union: A Different Kind of Dualism. Heinämaa, S., & Kaitaro, T. (2018). Descartes’ Notion of the Mind-Body Union and its Phenomenological Expositions. In The Oxford handbook of the history of phenomenology (p. 25). Oxford University Press. Thibaut, F. (2018). The mind-body Cartesian dualism and psychiatry. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 20(1), 3. …
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you
Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadlines.
Order Now